<뉴욕타임스>
Heejae Park OCSA 10th Grade
On June 12, 2018, United States president Donald Trump met with North Korean leader Kim Jong-un in order to discuss details about relations between the two nations. Much of this conversation included details concerning military practices and potential impacts.
The two leaders each offered their own parts of the agreement, with Trump’s statement promising to suspend military exercises carried out between the US and North Korea.
This statement elicited a wide breadth of reactions, mostly of shock or skepticism of the meeting.
Experts on nuclear programs and representatives of movements made to abolish nuclear armaments were not pleased with the agreement that was reached to by the end of the meeting, claiming that it did not serve the purposes of denuclearization and may have potentially validated the use of nuclear armaments in the political stage.
One of the more critical opinions came from Vipin Narang, an expert on North Korea’s nuclear arsenal. According to Narang on The Guardian, Trump failed to take away Kim’s weapons and instead set a stage where “Even a ‘pipsqueak fourth-rate power’ can bring the US to the table and win if it has nuclear weapons.”
Beatrice Fihn of the International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons shared this sentiment, as she also mentioned on The Guardian that this agreement essentially was “a big welcome party to the nuclear-armed club.”
Along with this disapproval, governmental officials and spokesmen from the Pentagon and the South Korean Defense Ministry expressed mild surprise at Trump’s promise to halt the military exercises.
Trump’s statement doesn’t seem to have immediately taken effect. According to the New York Times, Ft. Col. Jennifer Lovett of the United States military stated that there hasn’t been an order given to stop training exercises, and American troops will still move ahead with a military exercise in the fall.
Confusion also spread amongst the Pentagon, State Department, and the White House, as people attempted to discern what Trump’s statement would mean for the future of US-South Korean relations.
The suspension of military exercises was a drastic change for South Korea, as these exercises were a large part of relations running between the two nations, being one of the largest joint military exercises across the globe.
Before, these exercises would utilize many computer simulations intended to keep soldiers ready to repel direct conflict with North Korea. Due to this, these military exercises gave a large sense of security for South Korea, which may soon dissolve.
The suspension of these exercises raised doubts and fears in the South Korean capital that the United States were making decisions too quickly. According to the New York Times, The South Korean Defense Ministry gave a statement that it was still figuring out President Trump’s statement and what it would mean for South Korea.
Trump’s statement also gave way to many issues in logistics, as officials are now confused whether only big military exercises will be suspended or if all military ties with South Korea and the US were to be terminated.
<
Heejae Park OCSA 10th Grade>
댓글 안에 당신의 성숙함도 담아 주세요.
'오늘의 한마디'는 기사에 대하여 자신의 생각을 말하고 남의 생각을 들으며 서로 다양한 의견을 나누는 공간입니다. 그러나 간혹 불건전한 내용을 올리시는 분들이 계셔서 건전한 인터넷문화 정착을 위해 아래와 같은 운영원칙을 적용합니다.
자체 모니터링을 통해 아래에 해당하는 내용이 포함된 댓글이 발견되면 예고없이 삭제 조치를 하겠습니다.
불건전한 댓글을 올리거나, 이름에 비속어 및 상대방의 불쾌감을 주는 단어를 사용, 유명인 또는 특정 일반인을 사칭하는 경우 이용에 대한 차단 제재를 받을 수 있습니다. 차단될 경우, 일주일간 댓글을 달수 없게 됩니다.
명예훼손, 개인정보 유출, 욕설 등 법률에 위반되는 댓글은 관계 법령에 의거 민형사상 처벌을 받을 수 있으니 이용에 주의를 부탁드립니다.
Close
x