Attempts to avert the infamous “fiscal cliff” are like a super-high-stakes card game. But you have to imagine a game in which one player needs to go into a back room before he makes his bet and get the approval of a herd of rabid ferrets.
That would be Speaker John Boehner. Across from him at the card table sits the president. When Barack Obama won his big Senate race in 2004, his pals in the Illinois Legislature celebrated with one last evening of poker, in which they took the senator-elect for every dollar in his wallet.
So perhaps it was not surprising that in the negotiations, the president gave up quite a bit. You will remember that Obama had campaigned on keeping the Bush-era tax cuts only for the American middle class: families making $250,000 a year or less. O.K., possibly not all truly middle-class. Still, that was his line in the sand. There were long stretches this fall when tax-hike-for-over-$250,000 seemed to be his only specific plan for the next four years. But, this week, he let Boehner move the line. Pushed it up to $400,000. Plus, Obama gave way on entitlements by agreeing to change the cost-of-living adjustments on Social Security. Then, all eyes turned to the House speaker. And the rabid ferrets.
Pop Quiz: Try to guess what John Boehner did next, based on some of his recent comments about the fiscal-cliff negotiations:
“Ifs and ands and buts are like candy and nuts. If that were the case, every day would be Christmas.”
“Listen, I was born with a glass half full.”
“The president continues to blame anyone and everyone for the drought but himself.”
O.K., the last one was really not about the fiscal-cliff negotiations. But you have to admit it’s pretty good.
What Boehner did was to announce that instead of signing off on a deal, he was going to go back to his members and ask them to vote for “Plan B.”
We had never met Plan B before, but it turns out it’s a bill to raise taxes only on the Americans who make $1 million or more a year.
“Unfortunately, today we will have to go to Plan B because we want to make sure we do not go off the cliff,” said the House majority whip, Kevin McCarthy.
“Plan B” does not sound like something that would protect you from a cliff. It sounds like a less-than-desirable option for dental coverage.
“I hope the president will get serious soon,” said Boehner as he explained the complex thinking behind his bill during a 50-second press conference.
If only Boehner had taken the deal, liberal Democrats could now be enjoying a much-anticipated opportunity to complain that President Obama sold them out. He had all the cards, and he gave away the $250,000 one! He dropped the ace of entitlements! But, once again, the Republican majority in the House of Representatives conspired to make Obama look good.
At least the president made a serious offer while Boehner put up ... Plan B. Which does virtually nothing but continue the Bush tax cuts for those making less than $1 million a year. Everything else goes over the cliff. Laid-off workers getting extended unemployment benefits. Doctors treating Medicare patients.
Honestly, it sounded like something that Eric Cantor typed up on his smartphone on the way over from his office.
“I know the Democrats are baffled at what we’re doing,” said Representative Pete Sessions, a Texas Republican, during a rather sullen Rules Committee meeting. “We’re trying to find a bill we can pass.”
Sure, blame the ferrets.
At bottom, Plan B is just an attempt to shift the blame if the country falls over the fiscal cliff, destroying whatever faith Americans had in their national government and creating terror on Wall Street.
No matter what happens, let’s agree never again to call anything a “fiscal cliff.”
Imagine what would have happened if Congress and the president had said they were negotiating to “put the fiscal horse back in the barn” by Jan. 1. We’d be at the same place right now, but would anybody be talking about a potential stock market collapse? I think not.
And if it weren’t for the psychological impact of the cliff thing, would it be so bad if the Bush tax cuts just expired? It would save around $4 trillion over the next 10 years. The deficit would plummet, the fiscal horse would be back in his stall, the gate to the pasture would be locked and there would be several ICBM missiles guarding the budgetary barnyard.
Unfortunately, nobody in Washington seems to think this is a good plan.
If they can’t make a deal, on New Year’s Eve you can run around yelling: “The fiscal horse is about to fall over a cliff!” This, people, is what is known as having it all.
댓글 안에 당신의 성숙함도 담아 주세요.
'오늘의 한마디'는 기사에 대하여 자신의 생각을 말하고 남의 생각을 들으며 서로 다양한 의견을 나누는 공간입니다. 그러나 간혹 불건전한 내용을 올리시는 분들이 계셔서 건전한 인터넷문화 정착을 위해 아래와 같은 운영원칙을 적용합니다.
자체 모니터링을 통해 아래에 해당하는 내용이 포함된 댓글이 발견되면 예고없이 삭제 조치를 하겠습니다.
불건전한 댓글을 올리거나, 이름에 비속어 및 상대방의 불쾌감을 주는 단어를 사용, 유명인 또는 특정 일반인을 사칭하는 경우 이용에 대한 차단 제재를 받을 수 있습니다. 차단될 경우, 일주일간 댓글을 달수 없게 됩니다.
명예훼손, 개인정보 유출, 욕설 등 법률에 위반되는 댓글은 관계 법령에 의거 민형사상 처벌을 받을 수 있으니 이용에 주의를 부탁드립니다.
Close
x