The quadrennial presidential campaigns are important to the American people, the people who believe in their right to “life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness”. Therefore, an obviously important factor to the campaigns is appeal to the public. Recently, Donald Trump of the Republican Party and Hillary Clinton of the Democratic Party have emerged as the victors of Super Tuesday II. These two candidates have displayed their obvious differences, not only in their values, but also in their approaches toward the general public throughout this year’s presidential campaigns.
Clinton’s approach is rather conventional. She uses the vocabulary of an average middle or high schooler during speeches or interviews, displaying relative intelligence while allowing the average American citizen to comprehend her values and opinions. Adding to these appeals, the polls show Clinton’s advantage as a female candidate. According to “Super Tuesday 2: Clinton, Trump Take Big Leads Into Key Contests” by Hannah Hartig, John Lapinski, and Stephanie Psyllos of NBC News, 51 percent of registered Caucasian women, 72 percent of registered African- American women, and 56 percent of registered Hispanic women support Clinton. Even taking her email scandal into account, her resume of skill and experience won her a victory on Super Tuesday II.
Meanwhile, Trump took a very different approach from the very start. A large part of this approach is the use of language which an average elementary school student can comprehend. This may seem to be a rather foolhardy approach, but with the use of colloquial language, it has been easier for Trump to reach out to the poorly educated, adding to his explicit claim, “I love the poorly educated… We’re the smartest people. We’re the most loyal people”.
Those without sufficient education have felt powerless over their own lives in the past due to the unfortunate neglect they have faced in the cruel, first world society. Therefore, Trump’s approach gives these people a sense of inclusion and power, ultimately bringing Trump their votes.
All in all, Trump and Clinton both have their own, unique approaches towards this campaign. They believe in different things and fight for different ideas. The appeals of each candidate have their advantages and flaws, but in the end, both approaches won the two candidates their titles as winners.
<
Catherine Jang Granada Hills Charter High School 1>
댓글 안에 당신의 성숙함도 담아 주세요.
'오늘의 한마디'는 기사에 대하여 자신의 생각을 말하고 남의 생각을 들으며 서로 다양한 의견을 나누는 공간입니다. 그러나 간혹 불건전한 내용을 올리시는 분들이 계셔서 건전한 인터넷문화 정착을 위해 아래와 같은 운영원칙을 적용합니다.
자체 모니터링을 통해 아래에 해당하는 내용이 포함된 댓글이 발견되면 예고없이 삭제 조치를 하겠습니다.
불건전한 댓글을 올리거나, 이름에 비속어 및 상대방의 불쾌감을 주는 단어를 사용, 유명인 또는 특정 일반인을 사칭하는 경우 이용에 대한 차단 제재를 받을 수 있습니다. 차단될 경우, 일주일간 댓글을 달수 없게 됩니다.
명예훼손, 개인정보 유출, 욕설 등 법률에 위반되는 댓글은 관계 법령에 의거 민형사상 처벌을 받을 수 있으니 이용에 주의를 부탁드립니다.
Close
x