BALCOMBE, England — The lovely green hills of the High Weald are Tory country, a corner of West Sussex full of affluent residents who commute to London and like their golf and ambles and thatched cottages. So it is a surprise, in this conservative heartland, to stumble on an encampment of hundreds of activists, foraging in the hedgerows for edible greens, sawing wood for fires, playing flutes and generally enacting a kind of mini-Woodstock.
But peace and love are not the story. This is the heavily policed front line of Britain’s fracking war. A conflict has erupted over Prime Minister David Cameron’s vision of turning the English countryside into hydraulic-fracturing central, a place where West Sussex would release its inner West Texas.
“There’s about 1,300 trillion cubic feet of shale gas lying underneath Britain at the moment,” he enthused this month. Extracting even one-tenth of it would provide 51 years of gas supply. The man who vowed in 2010 to head “the greenest government ever” was adamant in an article in The Daily Telegraph: “We cannot afford to miss out on fracking.”To which banners on the road outside the village of Balcombe offer this retort: “Fracking kills.”Bianca Jagger has joined the battle against the dash for gas. A Green M. P. has been arrested. So has Natalie Hynde, daughter of the rockers Ray Davies of the Kinks and Chrissie Hynde of the Pretenders. Scuffles have erupted at the gates of the site where Cuadrilla Resources — whose chairman, Lord Browne, once headed BP — is drilling for oil, and is suspected of doing exploratory work for possible fracking.
Arthur Melduish, 29, emerged bleary-eyed from his tent. “Fracking is not wanted here on this planet,” he said. “It would poison our water supply. I’ve read how in the United States you can light your taps. We don’t drink fire in this country.”In fact — as shale gas production in the United States shot up from very little in 2000 to well over 10 billion cubic feet per day in 2010 and as gas prices have tumbled — the case that fracking causes severe groundwater contamination remains unproven, even if many studies suggest links to deteriorating quality.
Fracking involves shooting a cocktail of water, sand and chemicals under pressure into rock to fracture it and release the gas. It poses problems of methane leakage, and the disposal of huge quantities of waste water. In densely populated, water-strained areas, like southern England, these issues become especially acute. Europe as a whole is skeptical. France has banned it, as has Bulgaria. German beer makers are angst-filled.
So Cameron has stuck his neck out on fracking, with little or no national debate. He has vowed to win the fracking cause while avoiding any major speech on the government’s supposed commitment to low-carbon energy. Like the Labour prime minister Tony Blair’s advocacy of genetically modified food in the 1990s — an attempt that failed — he has taken on nature-loving middle England.
Why? There is huge money involved. Beyond economic considerations, fracking has become one of those hot-button politico-cultural issues (like G. M. crops) where you demonstrate your credentials in a post-ideological world. It is a cause to bray about before you consider the complex science, a badge of allegiance.
Cameron, whose Conservative Party faces an election in 2015, is more concerned about losing votes to the right (the Euro-skeptic U. K. Independence Party) than to the left. As fracking’s cheerleader, he secures his right flank — and gets The Daily Mail, The Telegraph and The Times of London behind him.
Sue Taylor, a chartered accountant and longtime Tory, is unimpressed. She appears at Balcombe’s Half Moon Inn pub with three friends and a T-shirt that reads “Conservatives against fracking.” She has started a Web site and just donated $30 to a local store collecting for the protesters. “I’ve never done anything like this before,” she says. (At the bar four men are grumbling about the “rent-a-mob” down the road.)What has enraged Taylor is the absence of any debate or scientific review, Cameron’s U-turn on protecting “Areas of Outstanding National Beauty” (the High Weald is one), the threat to water and the unsavory politics: The local Tory M. P. is Francis Maude, who, as minister for the Cabinet Office, appointed Lord Browne in 2010 as the government’s lead nonexecutive director, an advisory role.
Taylor’s friend Jackie Bedson says: “This is worse than anything the Bushes ever did — well, that we know of.”These Tory women’s fury is justified. I think fracking should have a British — and European — future. Shale gas is an important new element in global energy supplies, a cost cutter and a geostrategic game changer that lessens Western dependence on Russia and Iran. But Cameron, by talking about the need for transparency while providing none, has undermined that future, and pretty Balcombe may well be precisely the kind of place least suited to it.
댓글 안에 당신의 성숙함도 담아 주세요.
'오늘의 한마디'는 기사에 대하여 자신의 생각을 말하고 남의 생각을 들으며 서로 다양한 의견을 나누는 공간입니다. 그러나 간혹 불건전한 내용을 올리시는 분들이 계셔서 건전한 인터넷문화 정착을 위해 아래와 같은 운영원칙을 적용합니다.
자체 모니터링을 통해 아래에 해당하는 내용이 포함된 댓글이 발견되면 예고없이 삭제 조치를 하겠습니다.
불건전한 댓글을 올리거나, 이름에 비속어 및 상대방의 불쾌감을 주는 단어를 사용, 유명인 또는 특정 일반인을 사칭하는 경우 이용에 대한 차단 제재를 받을 수 있습니다. 차단될 경우, 일주일간 댓글을 달수 없게 됩니다.
명예훼손, 개인정보 유출, 욕설 등 법률에 위반되는 댓글은 관계 법령에 의거 민형사상 처벌을 받을 수 있으니 이용에 주의를 부탁드립니다.
Close
x