It’s hard to know whether to be more concerned about the debris spewed into orbit by the collision of two satellites or by the fact that no one was able to predict the collision before it happened. Neither bodes well for the long-term safety of space operations.
An American communications satellite owned by the Iridium network and a no-longer-functioning Russian communications satellite slammed into each other 790 kilometers above northern Siberia in what appears to be the first collision between two intact satellites.
Hundreds of fragments were strewn into space, where they will pose at least a small additional hazard to other satellites or spacecraft that move through the area. The international space station, orbiting 350 kilometers up with three astronauts aboard, will face an elevated but still very small risk of being struck by space debris.
Those who thought that our nation’s space tracking systems could see such things coming will be surprised to learn that there are gaps in coverage and capabilities. The military does indeed track some 19,000 objects in space, including active and nonfunctioning satellites, hordes of debris fragments, and thousands of unknown objects that might threaten the safety of American satellites. It publishes their coordinates and velocity in a catalog on a Web site that anyone can view free of charge.
But the military doesn’t calculate all possible collisions. It lacks the computing power, trained personnel and sensor capabilities to pull off that feat. Instead, it focuses primarily on potential collisions that might endanger the space station and shuttles, its own satellites and those of other federal agencies.
A private company fills part of the gap by assessing potential collision threats to other active satellites on a daily basis. It publishes a top 10 list of likely close encounters.
As it turned out, the satellite that was demolished did not make the top 10 list that day, partly because other satellites looked even more likely to pass close to debris and partly because these calculations are inherently imprecise. Iridium, which is ultimately responsible for its own satellites, apparently had no clue that one of them was about to be smashed.
The new debris adds to the growing amount of junk accumulating in orbit. Thus far the annoying objects have not had a major impact on human or robotic missions into space, but there are grave concerns for the future. At some cluttered altitudes, collisions are producing debris faster than gravity can eliminate it. If the trend is not reversed, one can imagine a time when it could be too risky or too expensive to fly spacecraft through the debris fields.
The United Nations has adopted voluntary guidelines to minimize the creation of new space debris. It recommends such steps as designing spacecraft so that no debris is released during normal operations, removing leftover propellants at the end of a mission and moving nonoperational satellites out of congested orbits.
The looming problem yet to be addressed is how to get rid of the debris and objects already up there and proliferating with every collision.
댓글 안에 당신의 성숙함도 담아 주세요.
'오늘의 한마디'는 기사에 대하여 자신의 생각을 말하고 남의 생각을 들으며 서로 다양한 의견을 나누는 공간입니다. 그러나 간혹 불건전한 내용을 올리시는 분들이 계셔서 건전한 인터넷문화 정착을 위해 아래와 같은 운영원칙을 적용합니다.
자체 모니터링을 통해 아래에 해당하는 내용이 포함된 댓글이 발견되면 예고없이 삭제 조치를 하겠습니다.
불건전한 댓글을 올리거나, 이름에 비속어 및 상대방의 불쾌감을 주는 단어를 사용, 유명인 또는 특정 일반인을 사칭하는 경우 이용에 대한 차단 제재를 받을 수 있습니다. 차단될 경우, 일주일간 댓글을 달수 없게 됩니다.
명예훼손, 개인정보 유출, 욕설 등 법률에 위반되는 댓글은 관계 법령에 의거 민형사상 처벌을 받을 수 있으니 이용에 주의를 부탁드립니다.
Close
x