President Cool needs to bring a little fury down on‘malefactors of wealth.’


WASHINGTON The president’s disgust at Wall Street looters was good. But we need more. We need disgorgement.

Disgorgement is when courts force wrongdoers to repay ill-gotten gains. And I’m ill at the gains gotten by scummy executives while they’re getting bailed out by us.

With the equally laconic Tim Geithner beside him, Mr.Obama called it“shameful”and“the height of irresponsibility”for Wall Street bankers to give themselves $18.4 billion worth of bonuses for last year.

They should know better, he coolly chided. But big shots? even Mr.Obama’s? seem impervious to knowing better. (Following fast on Geithner’s tax oversight, Tom Daschle withdrew his nomination after it was publicized that he was forced to pay $140,000 in back taxes he owed partly for three years’use of a car and a driver provided by a private equity firm.)

When you make money out of money, unmoored from morality and regulators, it must unhinge you. How else to explain corporate welfare executives partridge hunting in England, buying French jets and shopping for Lamborghinis?

Mr.Obama was less bracing than during the campaign, when A.I.G. executives were caught going to posh retreats after taking an $85 billion bailout. He called for them to be fired and to reimburse the federal Treasury. Now that he has the power to act, Mr.Obama spoke, as his spokesman Robert Gibbs put it,“like that disappointed parent that doesn’t embarrass you in the mall, but you feel like you’ve let somebody down.”

That’s not enough, not with the president and Geithner continuing to dole out what may end up being a trillion dollars to these “malefactors of great wealth,”as Teddy Roosevelt put it.

More than a disappointed parent, they need a special prosecutor. Anyone who gave bonuses after accepting federal aid should be fired, and that money should be disgorged to the Treasury.

Senator Claire McCaskill popped out a bill to limit the pay of anyone at firms taking federal money to no more than the president makes? $400,000.

“These people are idiots,”she said on the Senate floor.“You can’t use taxpayer money to pay out $18 billion in bonuses.... Right now they’re on the hook to us. And they owe us something other than a fancy wastebasket and $50 million jet.”

One Obama official said her idea is catchy, but it won’t work “because no one would come to Treasury to participate, and that means our economy would continue to stumble downward.”

Senator Chuck Grassley urged the administration to snatch back the bonuses.“They ought to give ‘em back or we should go get’em,”the Republican told me.“If this were Japan and a corporate executive did what is being done on Wall Street, they’d either go out and commit suicide or go before the board of directors and the country and take a very deep bow and apologize.”

He was shocked to learn that the Office of Management and Budget was dragging down a special inspector general’s investigation of what banks are doing with taxpayer money. (After complaints, the O.M.B. yielded on January 30.)

“Once in a while, some C.E.O. comes and talks to me and I wonder if they’re laughing under their breath at having to talk to someone who makes 1 percent of what they make,”he said.

Treasury officials and Representative Barney Frank are dubious about recouping bonuses.“Paulson let the cat out of the bag,”Frank said of Henry Paulson, Geithner’s predecessor,“and it can’t be gotten back.”

But aren’t taxpayers shareholders in these corporations now, and can’t shareholders sue or scream“You misspent my money!”like Judy Holliday?

“In‘The Solid Gold Cadillac,’”said Frank, who knows the movie.

“We got some preferred shares,”he mused,“but I don’t think we could sue on that basis.”

Rudy Giuliani resurfaced recently to defend corporate bonuses, telling CNN that cutting them would mean less spending in restaurants and stores.

Stupid. Even without bonuses, these gazillionaires can still eat out.

Some Obama policy makers still buy into the notion that if they’re too strict, these economic royalists, to use F.D.R.’s epithet, might balk at the bailout, preferring perks over the prospect of their banks going belly-up.

The president needs to think like New York state’s attorney general, Andrew Cuomo.“‘Performance bonus’for many of the C.E.O.’s is an oxymoron,”he said.“I would tell them, a) you don’t deserve a bonus, b) where are you going to go? and c) if you want to go, go.”


MAUREEN DOWD