▶ Will a diet-conscious president help change how Americans eat?
By KIM SEVERSON
From the moment it was clear that Barack Obama was going to be president, people who have dedicated their lives to changing how America eats thought they had found their savior.
It wasn’t long before the pleas to the new chief were piling up.
Ruth Reichl, the editor of Gourmet magazine, wants a new high-profile White House chef who cooks delicious local food. Wayne Pacelle, head of the Humane Society of the United States, wants policies requiring better treatment for farm animals.
Parents want better public-school lunches. Consumer groups are dreaming of a new, stronger food safety system. And a farmer in Maine is asking the presidentelect to plow under an acre of White House lawn for an organic vegetable garden.
Although Mr.Obama has proposed changes in farm and rural policies and emphasizes the connection between diet and health, there is nothing to indicate he has a special interest in a radical makeover of the way food is grown and sold.
Still, the dream endures. To advocates who have watched scattered calls for changes in food policy gather political and popular momentum, Mr.Obama looks like their kind of president. Not only does he seem to possess a more sophisticated palate than some of his recent predecessors, but he will also take office in an age when organic food is mainstream and books calling for an overhaul in the American food system are best sellers.
As for Michelle Obama, she has said in interviews that she tries to buy organic food and watches the amount of high-fructose corn syrup in her family’s diet.
The Obamas are a different kind of first family, said David Kamp, who traced the history of the modern gourmet-food movement in his book,“The United States of Arugula”(Broadway, 2006).“This time we have a Democrat in office that seems to live the dream and speak the language of both food progressivism and personal fitness,”Mr.Kamp said.
For many food activists, a new secretary of agriculture with a different agenda was high on their wish list.
Last month Mr.Obama appointed Tom Vilsack, the former governor of Iowa, which grows much of the nation’s corn and soybeans. Mr.Vilsack has talked about reducing subsidies to some megafarms, supports better treatment of farm animals and wants healthier food in schools. But his selection drew criticism because he is a big fan of alternative fuels like corn-based ethanol and is a supporter of biotechnology, both anathema to people who want to shift government support from large-scale agricultural interests to smaller farms.
It becomes clear that just because changing the food system is the first priority for some, it isn’t so for everyone. The pragmatists understand.
“This president is taking over when the economy is the worst it has been in our lifetime and we are in the middle of wars,”said Ann Cooper, the chef who transformed the school food program for the Berkeley Unified School District in California.“I think it’s somewhere between naive and fairy tale to think his No.1 focus is going to be on food.”
Some food-system reformers may have a better chance of getting what they want than others do. A coalition of communitybased groups called the U.S. Working Group on the Food Crisis wrote to Mr.Obama asking him to make hunger and the global food crisis a top priority. Their optimism is based on Mr.Obama’s promise to abolish childhood hunger by 2015.
They are also counting on his desire to tackle climate change and overhaul energy and health care policies.
“If he’s serious about doing this, then he’ll have to address the current problems of our food system, which are inextricably linked to these other problems,”said Christina Schiavoni of World Hunger Year, which is part of the coalition.
In her view and others’,diets filled with healthier food produced by less intrusive farming practices can reduce medical problems like obesity and be easier on the environment.
Many are holding out hope for a new White House chef. A chef who cooks local and organic food could change things faster than any cabinet appointment, Ms.Reichl said.
“It’s like the hat manufacturers being furious because J.F.K. didn’t wear a hat, and suddenly everyone in America stopped wearing hats,”she said.“It’s that simple.”
댓글 안에 당신의 성숙함도 담아 주세요.
'오늘의 한마디'는 기사에 대하여 자신의 생각을 말하고 남의 생각을 들으며 서로 다양한 의견을 나누는 공간입니다. 그러나 간혹 불건전한 내용을 올리시는 분들이 계셔서 건전한 인터넷문화 정착을 위해 아래와 같은 운영원칙을 적용합니다.
자체 모니터링을 통해 아래에 해당하는 내용이 포함된 댓글이 발견되면 예고없이 삭제 조치를 하겠습니다.
불건전한 댓글을 올리거나, 이름에 비속어 및 상대방의 불쾌감을 주는 단어를 사용, 유명인 또는 특정 일반인을 사칭하는 경우 이용에 대한 차단 제재를 받을 수 있습니다. 차단될 경우, 일주일간 댓글을 달수 없게 됩니다.
명예훼손, 개인정보 유출, 욕설 등 법률에 위반되는 댓글은 관계 법령에 의거 민형사상 처벌을 받을 수 있으니 이용에 주의를 부탁드립니다.
Close
x