By CLIFFORD J.LEVY
ZHODINO, Belarus - The voting monitor began his rounds on election day here at Polling Place No.7.“Issues? Violations?’’he asked the poll workers, glancing around casually. They said no, so he left.
The monitor, Kholnazar Makhmadaliyev, quickly moved from one polling site (“What’s up? Things O.K.?’’) to another (“Everything fine here?’’), shaking a lot of hands, offering abundant compliments and drinking brandy with this city’s mayor.
Such went Mr.Makhmadaliyev’s stint on a large observer mission led by the Kremlin that concluded that Belarus, a former Soviet republic and an ally of Russia, had conducted a“free, open and democratic”parliamentary election in late September.
The Kremlin monitors’version of reality, though, clashed with the one described by a European security group, whose own monitors dismissed the election as a sham tainted by numerous shortcomings, not the least of which was vote rigging.
The monitors dispatched by the Kremlin did not report anything like that. Nor did they raise concerns about Belarus’s security service, still called the K.G.B., which had exerted harsh pressure on the opposition, imprisoning several of its leaders over the last year and thwarting their campaigns. Or about state-controlled television broadcasts repeatedly branding opposition leaders as traitors.
Or, for that matter, about the final results: a sweep of every seat in the 110-member Parliament by supporters of President Aleksandr G.Lukashenko, often described as Europe’s last dictator.
The Kremlin under Vladimir V. Putin has sought to bolster authoritarian governments in the region that remain loyal, and these election monitoring teams - 400 strong in Belarus alone - are one of its newer innovations. They demonstrate the lengths to which the Kremlin will go to create the illusion of political freedom in Russia and other former Soviet republics, even though their structures of democracy have been hollowed out.
The monitors also provide a counterweight to observers from the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe, who denounce the same elections.
“These monitors really illustrate what is happening in the post-Soviet space,”said Andrei Sannikov, an organizer of European Belarus, an opposition movement.“The monitors bless everything - in Russia, Belarus, Kazakhstan, places where we know there are no real elections.”Ultimately, Mr.Sannikov said,“they want some kind of legitimacy, especially in the eyes of the West.”
By backing these leaders, Russia has also reaped economic benefits and maintained its regional sphere of influence. It has done so even while seeking to destabilize pro-Western neighbors, most notably when it invaded Georgia in August in response to what it said was Georgian aggression. Belarus, which has 10 million people, is the only former Soviet bloc nation to Russia’s west that maintains warm ties with the Kremlin.
The United States and its NATO allies have also sought good relations with many of the authoritarian governments in the region, to offset the Kremlin’s influence, to maintain military bases and to increase business opportunities. Still, the West has generally refrained from endorsing the results of elections in these countries.
Senior Russian officials refer to Western election monitors as a tool that the West uses to smear Russia and other former Soviet republics.
Vladimir A.Pekhtin, a vice speaker of the Russian Parliament who supervised the Kremlin monitors in Belarus, said every recent election in the former Soviet Union had been democratic and fair. He included countries like Uzbekistan, whose president has ruled since the end of Communism and was re-elected last year.
Asked about the conclusions of Western monitors in Belarus, Mr.Pekhtin said,“They just made it up, invented it, to try to show that there was some kind of rot.”
Igor Y.Yurgens, an adviser to President Dmitri A.Medvedev who is the chairman of a liberal-leaning research group set up by Mr.Medvedev, described the Kremlin missions as doing little more than currying favor with neighbors.
“It’s a pretty clumsy thought that the near abroad can be consolidated only through this, through being polite to the authorities in place,”he said.
“They regard it as a diplomatic endeavor - be good to your ally,”Mr.Yurgens said, referring to the Kremlin.“Don’t poke him in the eye when the whole of the West is poking him already.”
Russia hires monitors like Kholnazar Makhmadaliyev, left, who praised a Belarus election that Europeans said was unfair./ANDREI LIANKEVICH FOR THE NEW YORK TIMES
댓글 안에 당신의 성숙함도 담아 주세요.
'오늘의 한마디'는 기사에 대하여 자신의 생각을 말하고 남의 생각을 들으며 서로 다양한 의견을 나누는 공간입니다. 그러나 간혹 불건전한 내용을 올리시는 분들이 계셔서 건전한 인터넷문화 정착을 위해 아래와 같은 운영원칙을 적용합니다.
자체 모니터링을 통해 아래에 해당하는 내용이 포함된 댓글이 발견되면 예고없이 삭제 조치를 하겠습니다.
불건전한 댓글을 올리거나, 이름에 비속어 및 상대방의 불쾌감을 주는 단어를 사용, 유명인 또는 특정 일반인을 사칭하는 경우 이용에 대한 차단 제재를 받을 수 있습니다. 차단될 경우, 일주일간 댓글을 달수 없게 됩니다.
명예훼손, 개인정보 유출, 욕설 등 법률에 위반되는 댓글은 관계 법령에 의거 민형사상 처벌을 받을 수 있으니 이용에 주의를 부탁드립니다.
Close
x