Barack Obama advocates government spending to boost U.S. competitiveness. He spoke on economic issues in June.
By WILLIAM J. BROAD and CORNELIA DEAN
For decades, the United States dominated the global technological revolution. Today, that dominance is eroding. The nation’s high-technology balance of trade - the annual gap between exports and imports - is expected to be the largest ever this year, approaching $60 billion.
Both presidential candidates have made detailed arguments on how the nation can sharpen its competitive edge. Yet their visions are strikingly different. They diverge mainly on the appropriate role for the federal government.
Senator John McCain, the Republican nominee, seeks to encourage innovation by cutting corporate taxes and ending what he calls “burdensome regulations” that he says inhibit corporate investment.
Senator Barack Obama , the Democratic nominee, looks to the federal government to finance science, math and engineering education, as well as research that can produce valuable industrial applications.
At the request of The New York Times, the Information Technology and Innovation Foundation, a nonpartisan research group in Washington, estimated the annual costs of the plans and put Mr. Obama’s at $85.6 billion and Mr. McCain’s at $78.8 billion, excluding his proposed reductions in corporate taxes.
“The pressures of an unfolding fiscal crisis make these priorities recede on the list of what politicians want to do,” said Robert Reischauer, director of the Congressional Budget Office from 1989 to 1995.
Mr. McCain became chairman of the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation in 1997 and held the position until early 2005. Though often approving of business and deregulation, he could reverse course if the issue impinged on what he saw as national security concerns.
One initiative of his sought to restrict exports of certain high-tech goods. “It’s critical that safeguards are in place,” he said in 1998 at a hearing on missile and satellite exports to China.
Republicans later charged the Clinton administration with dangerous irresponsibility in allowing the Chinese to import high-performance computers. The Republican efforts helped tighten export regulations. But technology analysts faulted the attack as political and the new rules as unnecessary.
Domestically, the commerce committee sought over the years to spur things like Internet development, the private space industry and the commercial licensing of federally owned inventions. In 2005 Mr. McCain introduced a bill to limit heattrapping gases that also sought to spur the development of green technologies.
Later that year, the National Academies, the nation’s most eminent scientific and engineering organization, issued an influential report calling for an urgent effort to boost American competitiveness. It proposed, among other things, that the government increase the basic research budget by 10 percent a year for seven years; finance scholarships for math and science teaching careers and college-level study of science, math and engineering; and make broadband Internet access available nationwide at low cost.
In 2007 Mr. Obama joined other senators to introduce a bill that built on the report’s recommendations. He offered amendments intended to increase federal support of science education . The Senate passed the bill 88 to 8; Mr. McCain abstained. President Bush signed the bill into law, but Congress has yet to finance its programs, estimated to cost about $43 billion for the first three years.
In their campaign platforms, Mr. Mc- Cain and Mr. Obama advocate making research and development tax credits permanent. They would strengthen the position of presidential science adviser, they support human exploration of space, and they agree that access to broadband must be expanded.
But Mr. Obama proposes doubling federal financing for basic research in physics, life sciences, mathematics and engineering over 10 years. He promises to review export rules he calls outdated and sees as having “unduly hampered the competitiveness of the domestic aerospace industry.”
Mr. McCain says easing regulatory and tax burdens will encourage private spending on research. Even before the current economic crisis, he proposed freezing, at least initially, almost all discretionary federal spending - a budget category that includes federal research efforts.
댓글 안에 당신의 성숙함도 담아 주세요.
'오늘의 한마디'는 기사에 대하여 자신의 생각을 말하고 남의 생각을 들으며 서로 다양한 의견을 나누는 공간입니다. 그러나 간혹 불건전한 내용을 올리시는 분들이 계셔서 건전한 인터넷문화 정착을 위해 아래와 같은 운영원칙을 적용합니다.
자체 모니터링을 통해 아래에 해당하는 내용이 포함된 댓글이 발견되면 예고없이 삭제 조치를 하겠습니다.
불건전한 댓글을 올리거나, 이름에 비속어 및 상대방의 불쾌감을 주는 단어를 사용, 유명인 또는 특정 일반인을 사칭하는 경우 이용에 대한 차단 제재를 받을 수 있습니다. 차단될 경우, 일주일간 댓글을 달수 없게 됩니다.
명예훼손, 개인정보 유출, 욕설 등 법률에 위반되는 댓글은 관계 법령에 의거 민형사상 처벌을 받을 수 있으니 이용에 주의를 부탁드립니다.
Close
x