By Ryu Jin
Staff Reporter
South Korea’s top diplomat on Wednesday criticized Japan for repeated attempts to distort history in its textbooks, affirming there cannot be dual truths in historical facts.
``Japan should face history as it is and develop future-oriented relations with South Korea based on a correct recognition of history,’’ Foreign Affairs-Trade Minister Ban Ki-moon said in his weekly media briefing.
He was responding to a question from a Japanese newspaper’s Seoul correspondent, who argued he saw no problem with the recently endorsed Japanese textbook, which many historians have accused of glossing over wartime atrocities by imperial Japan.
``Views can differ according to social factors or others, but I believe there is only a single truth in historical facts,’’ Ban said. ``And if they are described based on subjective interpretations, that’s what we call distortion.’’
Authored by a group of right-wing scholars, the history book has been a source of diplomatic friction between Japan and its Asian neighbors for the past several years. It is called the ``Fusosha textbook’’ after the name of its publisher, Fuso Publishing Co.
The textbook fails to mention the Korean women forced by Japan to serve as sex slaves for its military and includes many controversial descriptions of past events, including those of the Nanjing Massacre _ the mass killing and rape of Chinese from December 1937 to January 1938 after Japan captured the city.
Its earlier version, published in 2001, sparked criticism in neighboring nations, including South Korea and China, though it was adopted by only 0.04 percent _ much less than Fusosha’s target of 10 percent _ of Japanese junior high schools at the time.
The 2001 version, for example, said: ``The Tokyo Court admitted that when the Japanese army occupied Nanjing, large numbers of Chinese civilians were killed.’’ But the new revision has deleted this acknowledgement. One of its authors said the Nanjing event was ``a lie that was fabricated to condemn Japan.’’
In addition, the revised version alleged that the occupation of Korea helped its modernization and stabilized East Asia, deliberately avoiding any mention of the suffering of the so-called comfort women.
Japanese civic groups, as well as activists in Korea and other Asian nations, have staged a signature-collection campaign and submitted 29,000 signatures to the education commission earlier this year to prevent the controversial book from being adopted.
The middle-high school, which is scheduled to open in April next year, will offer a combined curricula for middle and high school.
Many Koreans still harbor deep resentment against Japan for its harsh colonial rule of the Korean Peninsula from 1910 to 1945 when many young Korean men and women were forced to serve the Japanese army or provide sexual services to it. Several million Koreans were also forcibly taken to Japan as laborers during the period.
The Seoul-Tokyo relations, which have showed some signs of improvement from time to time, have often been strained by Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi’s repeated visits to the Yasukuni Shrine that commemorates Japanese war dead and other politicians’ remarks justifying their past wrongdoings.
jinryu@koreatimes.co.kr
댓글 안에 당신의 성숙함도 담아 주세요.
'오늘의 한마디'는 기사에 대하여 자신의 생각을 말하고 남의 생각을 들으며 서로 다양한 의견을 나누는 공간입니다. 그러나 간혹 불건전한 내용을 올리시는 분들이 계셔서 건전한 인터넷문화 정착을 위해 아래와 같은 운영원칙을 적용합니다.
자체 모니터링을 통해 아래에 해당하는 내용이 포함된 댓글이 발견되면 예고없이 삭제 조치를 하겠습니다.
불건전한 댓글을 올리거나, 이름에 비속어 및 상대방의 불쾌감을 주는 단어를 사용, 유명인 또는 특정 일반인을 사칭하는 경우 이용에 대한 차단 제재를 받을 수 있습니다. 차단될 경우, 일주일간 댓글을 달수 없게 됩니다.
명예훼손, 개인정보 유출, 욕설 등 법률에 위반되는 댓글은 관계 법령에 의거 민형사상 처벌을 받을 수 있으니 이용에 주의를 부탁드립니다.
Close
x