By Na Jeong-ju
Staff Reporter
Justice Minister Kang Kum-sil on Wednesday indicated the government may retain Prosecutor General Song Kwang-soo, despite speculation the presidential office of Chong Wa Dae may not condone his public show of disrespect for a government plan to streamline the prosecution.
Kang also made it clear the government has no concrete plan to remove a key investigation bureau of the Supreme Public Prosecutors’ Office (SPPO), an issue at the center of disputes between the government and the prosecution.
``We asked Song not to take issue with the government plan again, and he has agreed,’’ Kang said in a press briefing in the ministry building in Kwachon. ``As those in charge of the Justice Ministry and the prosecution, we apologize for causing concern and unnecessary debates.’’
The minister’s comment appears to be a gesture to patch up the ministry’s relationship with the prosecution, recently soured following media reports the government may scrap the central investigation bureau, the backbone of the SPPO.
On Tuesday, the rift between the two government bodies reached its peak when President Roh Moo-hyun made no secret of his displeasure over Song’s remarks that the government’s restructuring plan is aimed at weakening the power of the prosecution.
``It is inappropriate for the head of the prosecution to comment on government plans based on groundless rumor,’’ Roh told a Cabinet meeting at Chong Wa Dae. ``Some government-level measures should be taken immediately to resolve this issue.’’
Roh’s comments were interpreted as an indication the government wants Song to resign, taking responsibility for remarks allegedly targeting those at the center of power.
Based on media reports, Song raised speculation that ``those who are displeased with our investigation of political funds are trying to debilitate the prosecution.’’
Kang said however the government is indeed undergoing a study on how to successfully restructure the prosecution for efficient operation, but contended ``the measures are not to weaken the prosecution’s power.’’
``The ministry does not want this kind of problem to arise again,’’ said Kang, a strong backer and arguably an architect of Roh’s prosecution and judiciary reform.
The rift is widely seen as having resulted from a power struggle between the government and the prosecution, which has distanced itself from intervention in politics after dozens of politicians and businessmen were indicted as a result of months-long investigations into illicit fund raising.
Tension has been rising among prosecutors since the ministry announced its plan to revamp the prosecution. Last month, Roh instructed officials to conduct a feasibility study for the creation of an investigative body under the presidential Korea Independent Commission Against Corruption, separate from the state prosecution to monitor corruption among high-level government officials.
Government officials said the idea is to strengthen integrity in officialdom, but many prosecutors worry the presidential investigative body will undercut the role of the prosecution.
Adding fuel to the controversy, the ministry last week announced it will close down 16 public security bureaus at district prosecutors’ offices as part of a prosecution personnel restructuring. The plan drew wide criticism from prosecutors, who saw the move as an encroachment upon the independent investigative rights of their organization.
jj@koreatimes.co.kr
댓글 안에 당신의 성숙함도 담아 주세요.
'오늘의 한마디'는 기사에 대하여 자신의 생각을 말하고 남의 생각을 들으며 서로 다양한 의견을 나누는 공간입니다. 그러나 간혹 불건전한 내용을 올리시는 분들이 계셔서 건전한 인터넷문화 정착을 위해 아래와 같은 운영원칙을 적용합니다.
자체 모니터링을 통해 아래에 해당하는 내용이 포함된 댓글이 발견되면 예고없이 삭제 조치를 하겠습니다.
불건전한 댓글을 올리거나, 이름에 비속어 및 상대방의 불쾌감을 주는 단어를 사용, 유명인 또는 특정 일반인을 사칭하는 경우 이용에 대한 차단 제재를 받을 수 있습니다. 차단될 경우, 일주일간 댓글을 달수 없게 됩니다.
명예훼손, 개인정보 유출, 욕설 등 법률에 위반되는 댓글은 관계 법령에 의거 민형사상 처벌을 받을 수 있으니 이용에 주의를 부탁드립니다.
Close
x